$treet $mart$ (vol. 31)
I have hired a lot of people in my career. North of 500 as of writing this week's newsletter.
At one point in my career, I was tasked with hiring 150 people in one year. And let's just say that I made all the mistakes.
But the biggest mistake I ever made in my hiring career was not having a system to sift the chaff from the wheat, in order to get to the "A" Players.
That's when I discovered, Geoff Smart and Randy Street, “Who — The A Method for Hiring” After reading the book, I quickly realized that I was a "Suitor Interviewer". Rather than rigorously interviewing a candidate, I spent my time selling the applicant on the opportunity.
Thankfully I had a good nose for talent. But I missed more often than I would like to admit because I was blinded by my own B.S. It was until I moved to a systematic approach and included a "Screening Interview" that I began to source the best candidates. And I strongly suggest that you follow suit because each hiring mistake cost you anywhere from $30,000-$100,000.
Are you a Vodoo Magic Interviewer?
Top ten voodoo hiring methods
Voodoo Hiring — Taken from: Geoff Smart and Randy Street, “Who — The A method for hiring”:
- The Art Critic — Hiring people based on gut instinct.
- The Sponge — A common approach among busy managers is to let everybody interview a candidate, with the risk of interviewers asking candidates exactly the same questions.
- The Prosecutor — Many managers act like the prosecutors they see on TV and aggressively question candidates, attempting to trip them up with trick questions and logic problems.
- The Suitor — Rather than rigorously interviewing a candidate, some managers spend all of their energy selling the applicant on the opportunity. Suitors are more concerned with impressing than assessing their capabilities.
- The Trickster — Then there are the interviewers who use gimmicks to test for certain behaviors. They might throw a wad of paper on the floor, for example, to see if a candidate is willing to clean it up.
- The Animal Lover — Many managers hold on stubbornly to their favorite pet questions — questions they think will reveal something uniquely important about a candidate.
- The Chatterbox — This technique has a lot in common with the “la-di-da” interview. The conversation usually goes something like this: “How about them Yankees! Man, the weather is rough this time of year. Did you grow up in California? So did I!”
- The Psychological and Personality Tester — Asking a candidate a series of bubble-test questions like “Do you tease small animals?” or “Would you rather be at a cocktail party or the library on a Friday night?” is not useful (although both are actual questions on popular psychology tests), and it’s certainly not predictive of success on the job.
- The Aptitude Tester — Tests can help managers determine whether has the right aptitude for a specific role, such as persistence for a business development position, but they should never become the sole determinant in a hiring decision.
- The Fortune-Teller — Just like a fortune-teller looking in a crystal ball to predict the future, some interviewers like into the future regarding the job at hand by asking hypothetical questions: “What would you do? How would you do it? Could you do it?”
Just like building a business, hiring "A" Players is a skill, one that you most likely don't have. Without hesitation, every entrepreneur needs to read Geoff Smart and Randy Street, “Who — The A Method for Hiring”
Join Us For Our Next Event on June 9th!
Reserve your spot today!
How did you like today's email?
Let us know what you think so we can continue to improve: